Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Service Tax Liability Clarified for International Courier Services: Deposit 10% to Waive Remaining Dues</h1> <h3>DHL EXPRESS INDIA PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-II</h3> The Tribunal directed the international courier service provider to deposit 10% of the service tax demand within a specified time frame, with the ... Waiver of pre-deposit - Import of service - Courier service - dispute is in respect of import of shipment where customers pays consideration to the local DHL entity abroad. Held that:- The shipments were booked by the service recipient with service provider i.e., DHL entity and both are located outside India. The applicants are only receiving such consignments and delivering in India. As per the agreement The DHL will compensate to the applicants in case the applicants fail to make up the cost. In the present proceedings there is no evidence on record to show that the applicants received any such compensation. In view of the decision in the case of Paul Merchants Ltd vs CCE, Chandigarh & others reported in - [2012 (12) TMI 424 - CESTAT, DELHI (LB)] as the service provider and service recipient is outside India we find prima facie merit in the contention of the applicant that the applicant are not liable to service tax. In respect of other shipments mentioned are (iii) of para 3 where overseas customers pay consideration to overseas DHL entity we find that the service provider and service recipient is within India though consideration for service is paid by the recipient of the shipment. As per the applicants such shipments were only 7 or 8%. Prima facie we find that the applicants had not made out a case in respect of such shipments. Taking into facts and circumstances of the case the applicants are directed to deposit the amount equal to 10% of the demand confirmed within eight weeks and report compliance on 18.11.2014. On deposit of the above mentioned amount, the pre-deposit of the remaining dues are waived and recovery thereof stayed for hearing the appeal - Partial stay granted. Issues:1. Waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties.2. Interpretation of service tax liability for courier services involving import and export shipments.3. Application of service tax in cases where service provider and recipient are located outside India.Analysis:The judgment deals with an application for waiver of pre-deposit of a substantial service tax amount along with interest and penalties. The applicant, an international courier service provider, was issued a Show Cause Notice by the Revenue regarding service tax liability on activities related to handling shipments in India. The main contention was whether the applicant should pay service tax on compensation received for services in India where delivery is made, especially in cases of import shipments where overseas customers paid consideration to an overseas entity. The Revenue relied on agreements to support its claim.The adjudicating authority upheld the demand, emphasizing that the applicant did not consider compensation received for services in India when discharging service tax liability. However, the applicant argued that they were paying service tax on revenue earned from courier business generated within India as per contractual agreements with overseas entities. They highlighted that they were not receiving compensation for shipments delivered in India which were booked abroad.The Tribunal noted that the applicant was providing courier services for various transactions, including import shipments where customers paid consideration to the overseas entity. In cases where the service provider and recipient were outside India, the Tribunal found merit in the applicant's argument that they were not liable to pay service tax. However, for shipments where customers paid consideration to overseas entities, the Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 10% of the demand within a specified time frame, with the remaining dues waived upon compliance.In conclusion, the judgment clarifies the service tax liability for courier services involving import and export shipments, especially when service providers and recipients are located outside India. It highlights the importance of considering contractual agreements and the specific circumstances of each transaction to determine the applicability of service tax.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found