Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit of Service Tax paid on Goods Transport Agency services used for transportation of final products up to the customer's premises or the port of export was admissible when the place of removal was found to be beyond the factory gate.
Analysis: The appellate authority had examined the invoices, purchase orders and insurance documents and found that the delivery terms showed free delivery, FOB destination, delivery charges inclusive, or delivery at the buyer's premises. On that basis, it held that the price included transportation charges and that ownership of the goods remained with the manufacturer until delivery at the agreed destination. The authority also relied on the departmental circular and the supporting judicial view that where transportation cost forms part of the value and delivery is completed only at the buyer's premises or port of export, outward transportation up to that point qualifies as an eligible input service. The Tribunal found no infirmity in that reasoning.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit on GTA services for transportation up to the customer's premises or port of export was admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the contractual terms and supporting documents show that the place of removal is the buyer's premises or the port of export, outward transportation up to that point is an input service eligible for CENVAT credit.