Export of service and Indian taxability of offshore IT services required fresh examination under the service tax rules.

Service tax liability on onsite and offshore IT services rendered to a foreign recipient in Korea depended on whether the recipient was outside India and whether the offshore component satisfied the export of service conditions under Rule 3(1)(iii) read with Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The record indicated invoices were raised for the Korean transaction and VAT or GST was stated to have been discharged under Korean law, but the adjudicating authority had not examined whether the services were taxable in India or qualified as export of service. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of taxability and export treatment.

---

---

Issues: Whether service tax was payable in India on the services rendered in Korea under the tripartite arrangement, and whether the offshore component qualified as export of service.

Analysis: The appeal concerned a composite arrangement for onsite and offshore information technology services rendered to a foreign recipient in Korea. The record indicated that the service recipient remained outside India, invoices were raised for the Korean transaction, and VAT or GST was stated to have been discharged under Korean law. The adjudicating authority had not examined whether the transaction was taxable in India at all or whether the offshore services satisfied the requirements of export of service under Rule 3(1)(iii) read with Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005.

Outcome: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of the taxability issue and the export of service claim.

---