Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer who had effected inter-State purchases in earlier years could be denied the benefit of compounding assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for the assessment year 2009-10, and whether the revisional assessment order was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The earlier decision relied upon held that, in the absence of a statutory provision disentitling a dealer from compounding merely because of inter-State purchases in previous years, such purchases by themselves do not defeat the claim for assessment under Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, so long as the turnover conditions are satisfied. The same reasoning was applied to the present facts, and the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim was found unsustainable. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration in the light of the governing principle.
Conclusion: The denial of the benefit of compounding assessment on the sole ground of earlier inter-State purchases was held to be unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside with a direction for fresh decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere inter-State purchases in earlier years do not, by themselves, disqualify a dealer from compounding assessment where the statute does not impose such a bar and the relevant turnover requirements are otherwise satisfied.