TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai Upholds Interest on Differential Duty Decision</h1> <h3>SUNDRAM FASSTENERS LTD And FAITHFUL ENGINEERING PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PONDICHERRY</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to demand and uphold interest on differential duty, rejecting the ... Demand of interest on differential duty - Section 11AB - Escalation in prices - Held that:- Supreme Court in the case of CCE Pune Vs SKF India Ltd. held that interest is payable on payment of differential duty at later date on retrospective revision of price. On the similar issue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs International Auto Ltd. following the earlier decision passed in the case of SKF Ltd. (2009 (7) TMI 6 - SUPREME COURT) allowed the appeal filed by Revenue. In view of that, I do not find any infirmity in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) - Decided against assessee. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI rejected appeals by appellants who raised supplementary invoices based on price escalation clauses, as interest on differential duty was demanded and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) citing Supreme Court rulings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
