Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a service tax and CENVAT credit dispute.
Analysis: The demand relating to inclusion of the value of free issue materials in the taxable value was covered by the Larger Bench view in Bhayana Builders and therefore disclosed a strong prima facie case for the appellant. The demand relating to the nature of the construction activity for the period 2004-05, and the dispute concerning availment of CENVAT credit on input services used for taxable and exempted outputs, required examination of evidence and did not justify total waiver at that stage.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 5 lakh, and upon such deposit the balance dues would remain waived and recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal.