Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte order of the Tax Board, passed without service and opportunity of hearing to the assessee, was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision.
Analysis: The record showed that the grievance of non-service before the Tax Board was not denied in the reply. In such circumstances, the order had been passed without affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing. Without entering into the merits of the penalty under section 76(6) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003, the denial of hearing constituted a breach of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The ex parte order of the Tax Board was unsustainable and was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Tax Board for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner.