Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer is entitled to adjustment or rebate of sales tax paid on purchase of packing material used for packing its manufactured goods under the Haryana General Sales Tax law.
Analysis: The packing material was purchased after payment of tax and was used for packing the manufactured crockery so that it could be made marketable and withstand transit. The statutory scheme under rule 24(j) allowed deduction of the purchase value of goods subjected to tax at the first stage and used in manufacture. The retrospective explanation inserted in section 15A expressly brought containers and packing materials used for packing manufactured goods within the expression goods used in manufacture. In view of that amendment, the restrictive view taken by the revisional and appellate authorities could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The manufacturer was entitled to the benefit of adjustment or rebate on the tax paid for packing material, and the denial of such benefit was unjustified.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders and the recovery proceedings based on them were quashed, and the assessing authority was directed to recompute the admissible adjustment in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing statute is retrospectively amended to include packing materials within goods used in manufacture, a dealer is entitled to the corresponding tax adjustment or rebate on eligible first-stage purchases.