Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT directs re-examination of assessee's eligibility for Section 10A deduction</h1> The ITAT set aside the lower authorities' orders and directed the AO to re-examine the assessee's eligibility for deduction under Section 10A. The AO was ... Claim of deduction u/s 10A where assessee originally claimed exemption u/s 10B and found not eligible – Specific approval by Board not obtained – Held that:- The decision in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI (CENTRAL) – I Versus CONTIMETERS ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD. [2008 (12) TMI 4 - HIGH COURT DELHI] followed - the assessee made a claim of deduction u/s 10A during assessment proceedings and also filed the audit report - the assessee’s case is in a better footing because in the return of income, the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 10B - deduction u/s 10A was only an alternative claim which assessee made only when the AO disputed the assessee’s eligibility to deduction u/s 10B - the assessee could not have claimed deduction u/s 10B and 10A both in the return of income - the Revenue’s objection that the assessee is not entitled to deduction u/s 10A only because it was not claimed in the return of income cannot be accepted. Claim of deduction u/s 10A of the Act – Manufacture or production not began in EHTP or STP but in DTA - Held that:- The assessee produced the certificate issued by the Government of India, Department of Electronics, Electronics Hardware Technology Park Secretariat dated 16th November, 1998 - on the assessee’s application for setting up 100% export oriented unit in EHTP scheme, the Government of India was pleased to extend all facilities and privileges admissible under the EHTP scheme for conversion of assessee’s DTA unit into EHTP unit - assessee has claimed to have filed the above letter before the AO – the letter has not been considered by the AO - the matter needs re-examination in the light of the letter issued by the Government of India wherein the assessee was permitted to convert its DTA unit into EHTP unit – thus, the matter is remitted back to the AO for re-examination of the assessee’s eligibility for deduction u/s 10A in the light of letter of the Government of India. Non-receipt of sale proceeds in convertible foreign exchange – Held that:- Assessee contended that all the sale proceeds were received in convertible foreign exchange and assessee had duly furnished the evidence - The auditor’s certificate was also furnished certifying the details - as the matter is remitted back to the AO for examination of assessee’s claim u/s 10A afresh in the light of letter of Electronics Hardware Technology Park Secretariat - the AO is directed to examine this aspect also – Decided in favour of Revenue. Issues Involved:1. Deduction under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Alternative claim for deduction under Section 10A.3. Eligibility criteria for deduction under Section 10A.4. Receipt of sale proceeds in convertible foreign exchange.5. Non-claiming of deduction in the return of income.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Deduction under Section 10B:The assessee initially claimed a deduction under Section 10B, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the assessee did not obtain specific approval from the Board, a requirement for claiming this deduction. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction under Section 10B, which was upheld by the ITAT, citing that the STIP registration granted to the assessee was valid for allowing the deduction. The ITAT also noted that the AO had allowed the deduction under Section 10B in a previous year (AY 2004-05) and did not revise or reopen it, invoking the rule of consistency.2. Alternative Claim for Deduction under Section 10A:The assessee made an alternative claim for deduction under Section 10A during the assessment proceedings. This claim was rejected by the AO on three grounds: (i) it was not made in the return of income, (ii) the unit was not newly set up in EHTP/STP but was an old DTA unit, and (iii) the sale proceeds were not received in convertible foreign exchange. The CIT(A) did not adjudicate this alternative claim as the primary claim under Section 10B was allowed.3. Eligibility Criteria for Deduction under Section 10A:The Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court directed the ITAT to consider the assessee's claim under Section 10A. The assessee argued that the original claim under Section 10B was made in the return of income, and the alternative claim under Section 10A arose only when the AO raised doubts about the eligibility under Section 10B. The assessee furnished the required audit report under Section 10A and cited a certificate from the Electronics Hardware Technology Park Secretariat, which allowed the conversion of the DTA unit to an EHTP unit, thus making the unit eligible for benefits under Section 10A.4. Receipt of Sale Proceeds in Convertible Foreign Exchange:The assessee contended that all sale proceeds were received in convertible foreign exchange and provided evidence, including an auditor's certificate. The ITAT directed the AO to re-examine this aspect during the reassessment, noting that this requirement is equally applicable to deductions under Section 10B and 10A.5. Non-claiming of Deduction in the Return of Income:The ITAT referenced the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Contimeters Electricals P. Ltd., which held that filing the audit report along with the return is directory, not mandatory. Thus, the assessee's alternative claim under Section 10A during the assessment proceedings was valid as the audit report was filed before the assessment was framed.Conclusion:The ITAT set aside the orders of the lower authorities and directed the AO to re-examine the assessee's eligibility for deduction under Section 10A, considering the certificate from the Electronics Hardware Technology Park Secretariat and the evidence of receipt of sale proceeds in convertible foreign exchange. The AO was instructed to allow adequate opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The appeals of the Revenue were deemed allowed for statistical purposes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found