Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Orders Deposit for Appeal, Waives Remaining Dues</h1> <h3>M/s. NICCO CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA-III</h3> The Tribunal directed the Applicants to deposit Rs. 8,53,502 within six weeks, failing which the Appeals would be dismissed. This amount was deemed ... Waiver of pre deposit - appellants, submits that in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, the appellant need not deposit the amount, as ordered by the Tribunal, as protection is available to the appellant under the said provision. - duty of waste and scrap generated during the course of manufacture of wires and cables - Held that:- against the total outstanding dues of 5.90 Crore confirmed against all the applicants, a pre-deposit of ₹ 8,53,502/- would meet the ends of justice. As already mentioned above, the said amount of ₹ 8,53,502/- is around 1.44% of the total dues and 3.32% of the total duty confirmed, which in our opinion, would not result in any undue hardship to the Applicant, in the circumstances, when the total Revenue of the Applicant is ₹ 25175.10 Lakhs; Cash and Cash equivalents ₹ 1340.52 lakhs; and investments are ₹ 448.64lakhs for the financial year ending 31.03.2013. - stay granted partly. Issues Involved:1. Waiver of pre-deposit of total dues.2. Confirmation of demand for duty evasion.3. Financial hardship and applicability of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Waiver of Pre-Deposit of Total Dues:The Applicants sought waiver of pre-deposit of total dues adjudged against them, totaling Rs. 5,90,54,202. The Tribunal initially directed the Applicants to deposit 25% of Rs. 34,14,010, i.e., Rs. 8,53,502, and allowed waiver of the remaining dues. The Appeals were dismissed on 10.07.2013 for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction. The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court directed reconsideration of the Applications after restoring the dismissed Appeals. The Tribunal, upon fresh consideration, reaffirmed its earlier direction for the Applicants to deposit Rs. 8,53,502, which is around 1.44% of the total dues, considering the financial hardship and interest of revenue.2. Confirmation of Demand for Duty Evasion:The demand was confirmed against the Applicants on two counts:- The adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 4.47 crores against M/s NICCO Corporation Ltd. for failing to discharge duty on waste and scrap manufactured during the course of manufacturing wires and cables. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of this amount considering the Applicant's contention and financial hardship.- A demand of Rs. 34,14,010 and an equal amount of penalty were confirmed on the ground that the Applicants availed CENVAT Credit on 'waste and scrap' of wires and cables but cleared it as non-excisable goods without reversing the appropriate CENVAT Credit/duty. The Tribunal directed the Applicants to deposit 25% of this amount, i.e., Rs. 8,53,502, and waived the remaining dues.3. Financial Hardship and Applicability of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985:The Applicants argued that since the company is registered as a Sick Unit under BIFR and its net worth is negative, no pre-deposit could be directed. The Tribunal examined the Supreme Court's decision in Sagarika Acoustronics Pvt. Ltd. and concluded that the judgment was specific to its facts and not a binding precedent. The Tribunal also considered the Supreme Court's decision in Metal Box India Ltd., which stated that Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act does not apply to pre-deposits under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the financial position of the Applicant, with total revenue of Rs. 2,175.10 lakhs, cash equivalents of Rs. 1,340.52 lakhs, and investments of Rs. 448.64 lakhs, did not justify a complete waiver of the pre-deposit.Conclusion:The Tribunal directed the Applicants to deposit Rs. 8,53,502 within six weeks, failing which the Appeals would be dismissed. This amount was deemed sufficient to balance the financial hardship of the Applicants and the interest of the revenue. The remaining dues were waived, and their recovery stayed during the pendency of the Appeals. Compliance was to be reported on 28.05.2014.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found