Prima facie denial of scrap exemption and valuation dispute under Rule 8 justified only partial pre-deposit relief.

A prima facie objection to exemption on clearance of scrap to the domestic tariff area was upheld, as the conditions under Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. and paragraph 6.8(e) of the Foreign Trade Policy were not shown to be satisfied. The Tribunal also noted the valuation dispute concerning clearance of goods to sister units under Rule 8 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, where notional profit was added by the Revenue. On that assessment, complete waiver of pre-deposit for duty, interest and penalty was not justified, and partial pre-deposit was directed with stay on the balance.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit in respect of duty, interest and penalty, and whether a prima facie case was made out against the denial of exemption on clearance of scrap to the domestic tariff area.

Analysis: The dispute arose from valuation of goods cleared to sister units in the domestic tariff area, where the Revenue added notional profit while computing assessable value under Rule 8 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The appellant also cleared scrap claiming benefit of Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. dated 31-3-2003, but the Revenue objected on the ground that the scrap was not cleared in terms of para 6.8(e) of the Foreign Trade Policy and that the prescribed conditions had not been satisfied. On a prima facie assessment, the Tribunal accepted the Revenue's objection regarding the notification and also noted that the appellant had not established a case for complete waiver of the disputed dues.

Conclusion: Total waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10,00,000/- in addition to the amount already paid, and waiver of the balance dues with stay of recovery was granted during pendency of the appeal.

---