Curable procedural defects may not defeat merits-based adjudication where authorisation is later rectified and justice requires restoration.

Procedural defects in authorisation should not defeat adjudication on merits where the defect is curable and later rectified. The Court held that the Tribunal could recall its earlier dismissal of the Revenue's appeal for want of proper authorisation and restore the matter for hearing, because procedural rules are meant to advance justice rather than frustrate it. It also recognised that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may be used to correct an erroneous procedural order, and that Rule 11(2) of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 permits cure of the defect. The restored appeal was therefore fit for decision on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in recalling its earlier order dismissing the Revenue's appeal on a technical defect and restoring the appeal for hearing on merits.

Analysis: The writ petition challenged the Tribunal's power to entertain the Revenue's application for recall after the appeal had been dismissed for want of proper authorization. The Court held that procedural rules are intended to advance justice and should not be applied so rigidly as to defeat the merits of the matter. It further held that the High Court's supervisory power under Article 227 extends to correcting an erroneous procedural order passed by the Tribunal, and that the defect in authorization could be permitted to be cured under Rule 11(2) of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Since the defect was later rectified, the Tribunal acted within its jurisdiction in restoring the appeal.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in recalling the earlier dismissal order and restoring the Revenue's appeal for decision on merits.

Ratio Decidendi: Procedural defects that do not go to the merits and can be cured should not be allowed to defeat adjudication, and the Tribunal may recall a technical dismissal and restore the matter where justice requires and the defect is rectified.

---