Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal allowed for excise duty adjustment in accounting methods</h1> <h3>Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Schwabe Incoat</h3> The appeal by the Revenue against the deletion of an addition made by the AO on account of excise duty/modvat credit was allowed for statistical purposes. ... Valuation of stock - Deletion of Excise duty/modvat credit – Invocation of section 145A of the Act – Held that:- When the assessee is following exclusive method of accounting for the valuation of purchase and sale of goods as well as inventory, the further adjustment is required to be made to include the amount of excise duty in such valuation as per the provisions of section 145A of the Act – assessee has submitted that detailed working was filed by the assessee before the CIT(A) to show that the adjustments required to be made as per the provisions of section 145A of the Act are revenue neutral having no effect on the final profit of the assessee and after taking into consideration the working, the CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the AO by invoking the provisions of section 145A of the Act - revenue contended that working furnished by the assessee before the CIT(A) for the first time in support of its claim by the assessee has been relied upon by the CIT(A) to give relief to the assessee without giving an opportunity to AO to verify the same - there is also nothing in the order of CIT(A) to show that the working has been verified by him – thus, the matter is required to be remitted back to the AO for verification of the working furnishing by the assessee before the CIT(A) to show that the adjustments required to be made u/s 145A of the Act are revenue neutral having no effect on its final profit – Decided in favour of Assessee. Issues:- Valuation of closing stock under section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961- Treatment of excise duty and modvat credit in accountingValuation of Closing Stock under Section 145A:The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-27, Mumbai, where the addition made by the AO on account of excise duty/modvat credit was deleted. The AO had enhanced the value of closing stock of the assessee due to a difference between modvat credit claimed and expenses claimed for excise duty. The AO disallowed the expenditure on excise duty, considering it a double deduction due to the exclusive method of accounting followed by the assessee. The ld. CIT(A) found merit in the assessee's submissions, stating that adjustments under section 145A would be revenue neutral, leading to the deletion of the addition. The Tribunal agreed that adjustments under section 145A were necessary when following an exclusive method of accounting. However, the issue was remanded to the AO to verify the working submitted by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) to ensure the adjustments were indeed revenue neutral.Treatment of Excise Duty and Modvat Credit in Accounting:The AO had made additions to the total income of the assessee based on discrepancies in excise duty and modvat credit claimed. The AO disallowed the excise duty expenditure and enhanced the value of closing stock. The ld. CIT(A) accepted the assessee's contention that the adjustments were revenue neutral and deleted the addition. The Tribunal acknowledged the requirement of adjustments under section 145A for excise duty in exclusive method accounting. The issue was remanded to the AO for verification of the working submitted by the assessee. The appeal of the Revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the judgment primarily dealt with the valuation of closing stock under section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the treatment of excise duty and modvat credit in accounting. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adjustments under section 145A when following an exclusive method of accounting and remanded the issue to the AO for verification. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring the adjustments were indeed revenue neutral before making additions to the total income of the assessee.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found