Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether shipping, documentation and terminal handling services used for export were admissible input services for Cenvat credit, and whether the assessee was bound to claim refund under the export refund notifications instead of availing credit.
Analysis: For exports, the place of removal extends to the load port, so services availed at the port in connection with export cargo fall within the scope of input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Where two benefit schemes are available, the assessee may choose either one unless the notification expressly bars credit. The refund notifications relied upon did not prohibit availing Cenvat credit when refund was not claimed. The prior order in the assessee's own case and the revenue-neutral character of the issue also supported the view that credit could not be denied merely because refund was another available route.
Conclusion: The services were eligible input services and the assessee was entitled to avail Cenvat credit instead of being compelled to seek refund.
Ratio Decidendi: Where export-related services are used up to the port, the port becomes the place of removal and such services qualify as input services; if two statutory benefits are concurrently available and no express bar exists, the assessee may elect the more suitable benefit.