Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (6) TMI 469 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of appellant, overturns TP adjustments and disallowances by AO The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant by deleting the Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment and disallowances made by the Assessing ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal rules in favor of appellant, overturns TP adjustments and disallowances by AO

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant by deleting the Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The appellant succeeded in challenging the discrepancies in the assessed loss, addition due to differences in arm's length price, disallowance of scholarship expenses, and depreciation on projectors. The judgment highlighted the significance of using appropriate comparables and excluding non-advertisement expenses in TP adjustments.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of the assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Discrepancy in the assessed loss.
                          3. Addition due to difference in arm's length price (ALP) determined by Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).
                          4. Disallowance of expenses incurred on scholarships.
                          5. Disallowance of depreciation on projectors.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of the Assessment Order:
                          The appellant challenged the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 143(3) read with section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arguing that it was bad in law and on facts. However, the judgment does not provide a detailed discussion on this issue, implying that the primary focus was on the substantive grounds of appeal.

                          2. Discrepancy in the Assessed Loss:
                          The AO assessed the loss of the appellant at Rs. 108,32,69,967/- against the declared loss of Rs. 130,56,81,684/-. This discrepancy primarily arose due to the adjustments made by the TPO concerning the arm's length price of international transactions.

                          3. Addition Due to Difference in Arm's Length Price:
                          The main issue pertained to the addition of Rs. 22,23,28,349/- due to the adjustment of the arm's length price related to advertisement and publicity expenses.

                          - TP Adjustment on Advertisement and Publicity Expenses: The TPO considered Rs. 99,54,13,999/- as the expenditure on advertisement and publicity for TP adjustment. The appellant argued that Rs. 34,43,94,922/- incurred on discounts and incentives should be excluded, as per the Special Bench judgment in the case of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, stating that such expenses should not be considered as advertisement and publicity expenses.

                          - Bright Line Test: The TPO applied a bright line percentage of 2.89% based on comparables (Majestic Auto Ltd. and Scooters India Ltd.). The Tribunal found that Scooters India Ltd. was not an appropriate comparable as it dealt in three-wheelers, not two-wheelers. The Tribunal also noted that LML Ltd. and Kinetic Motor Co. Ltd. should not have been excluded as comparables.

                          - Reimbursement from AE: After excluding the discount and incentive expenses, the adjusted expenditure was less than the reimbursement received from the associated enterprise, Yamaha Motor Co., Japan. Therefore, no TP adjustment was required.

                          4. Disallowance of Scholarship Expenses:
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 60,750/- incurred on scholarships for employees' children. The Tribunal noted that this issue was covered in favor of the appellant by a previous judgment of the ITAT in the appellant's own case for the assessment year 2001-02. Consequently, this ground was allowed.

                          5. Disallowance of Depreciation on Projectors:
                          The AO restricted the depreciation on projectors to 15% instead of 60%. The Tribunal referred to several judgments, including the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision in the case of BSES Rajdhani Powers Ltd., which allowed 60% depreciation on computer peripherals. Respectfully following these precedents, the Tribunal allowed the higher depreciation rate.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the TP adjustment and disallowances made by the AO. The appellant's grounds concerning TP adjustments, scholarship expenses, and depreciation on projectors were all upheld in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of appropriate comparables and the exclusion of non-advertisement expenses in TP adjustments.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found