Tribunal affirms deletion of unsecured loan & share application money additions under section 68.

The Tribunal upheld the Ld.CIT(Appeals)'s decision to delete the additions of Rs.9,77,000/- under section 68 of the Act, related to an unsecured loan from Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar, and Rs.6 lakhs share application money. Additional evidence and confirmation by Mr. Kadiwar were deemed satisfactory, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal. The order was pronounced on 21st May 2014.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition of Rs.9,77,000/- under section 68 of the Act.
2. Deletion of the addition of Rs.9,77,000/- by the Ld.CIT(Appeals).
3. Unsecured loan from Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar.
4. Share application money from Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar.
5. Additional evidence submitted before the Ld.CIT(Appeals).
6. Confirmation of advance by Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar.
7. Finding on unexplained share application money.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)-V, New Delhi for the Assessment Year 2007-08. The main issue revolved around the addition of Rs.9,77,000/- under section 68 of the Act. The Assessing Officer had added this amount as an unsecured loan from Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar, but the Ld.CIT(Appeals) deleted this addition. The appellant challenged the deletion on the grounds of the assessee's failure to fulfill the requirements of section 68 and to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lender. However, the Tribunal upheld the deletion based on additional evidence submitted, including a confirmation letter, a certificate from the Branch Manager of SBI, and the acknowledgment return for the following assessment year.

Regarding the unsecured loan of Rs.3,77,000/-, it was clarified that the amount was repaid to Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar, who confirmed the advance for booking a plot and its subsequent repayment. The Tribunal found the additional evidence and Mr. Kadiwar's confirmation to be satisfactory, leading to the deletion of the addition under section 68 of the Act.

Moving on to the issue of Rs.6 lakhs share application money from Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar, the Ld.CIT(Appeals) had already dismissed the revenue's grounds as the identity, capacity, and genuineness of the transaction were established by the assessee. This finding was not contested by the Ld.D.R., resulting in the dismissal of this ground of appeal as well.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Ld.CIT(Appeals)'s decision to delete the additions, both the unsecured loan and the share application money, based on the evidence provided and the confirmation by Mr. Piyush Kanthilal Kadiwar. The appeal of the revenue was ultimately dismissed, and the order was pronounced in an open court on 21st May 2014.

---