Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of the amount debited from the credit account could be sanctioned in cash on the ground that the factory had closed and whether the entitlement depended on verification of subsequent duty payment through PLA.
Analysis: The amount in dispute had been paid from the credit account for filing the appeal, and the refund was later sanctioned in cash after the factory had closed. The Tribunal distinguished the case relied on by Revenue, noting that the bar against cash refund applied where no PLA payment had been made and the credit remained unutilised. Following the line of authority permitting cash refund where the unit had closed and duty had thereafter been paid through PLA, the matter required verification of whether such subsequent PLA payments were in fact made.
Conclusion: Cash refund could not be denied outright; the matter was restored for verification of subsequent PLA payment, and the assessee's appeal succeeded to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside and the refund sanction was restored, but only after verification of the subsequent duty payment position.
Ratio Decidendi: Where credit-paid duty is later found refundable and the unit has closed, cash refund may be allowed if the factual basis for entitlement, including subsequent PLA payment, is verified.