Related-party import valuation requires proof that the relationship did not influence price; inadequate analysis of alternate methods led to remand.

Imports from a related supplier could not have their declared invoice price accepted as transaction value unless the circumstances of sale showed that the relationship did not influence the price. The importer's price lists were limited to its own subsidiaries and did not demonstrate prices available to unrelated buyers, so matching internal price lists was insufficient to establish acceptable transaction value. The customs valuation analysis was also incomplete because the deductive value and computed value methods were not examined on a proper data-based footing under the valuation rules. The valuation findings were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication under the relevant customs valuation framework.

---

---

Issues: Whether the invoice price of imports from a related person could be accepted as transaction value, and whether the valuation required fresh examination under the deductive value and computed value methods.

Analysis: The imports were from a related supplier, so the declared value could be accepted only if the circumstances of sale showed that the relationship did not influence the price. The price lists produced by the importer were found to be confined to its own subsidiaries and did not establish prices available to unrelated buyers. On that footing, the transaction value could not be accepted merely because the invoice price matched internal price lists. The original and appellate orders were also found to have dealt inadequately with the deductive value and computed value methods, without proper data-based analysis in the manner required by the valuation rules.

Conclusion: The valuation findings were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication under the relevant customs valuation rules.

---