Court affirms focus on principal amount for secured creditors, rejecting inclusion of funded interest loan.

The court upheld the Official Liquidator's decision to focus solely on the principal amount for disbursement to secured creditors, despite the appellant's argument that the funded interest loan should also be considered a secured debt. The court found that accepting the funded interest as payable would disrupt the agreed-upon distribution ratio among creditors. The appellant was estopped from challenging the methodology previously agreed upon, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Admittance of debt by Official Liquidator
2. Classification of debt as secured or unsecured
3. Consideration of funded interest as secured debt
4. Methodology for disbursement of funds to secured creditors

Analysis:

Issue 1: Admittance of Debt by Official Liquidator
The appellant challenged the order passed by the Official Liquidator admitting a debt of Rs.12,55,69,834 as secured by a second charge over the company's immovable assets. The appellant contended that an additional debt of Rs.104 lakhs, owed on account of funded interest, should also be considered as a secured debt.

Issue 2: Classification of Debt
Initially, the Official Liquidator had admitted a total claim of Rs.13,75,69,834, with Rs.1,20,00,000 classified as secured debt and the remaining amount as unsecured debt. However, the appellant disputed this classification and filed an appeal, leading to a court order to reconsider the decision.

Issue 3: Consideration of Funded Interest
The main issue in this appeal was whether the funded interest loan of Rs.104 lakhs should have been recognized by the Official Liquidator as a secured debt. The appellant argued that the funded interest loan was indeed a secured debt of the company and should have been accepted by the Official Liquidator.

Issue 4: Methodology for Disbursement
The Official Liquidator explained that due to insufficient funds, all secured creditors had unanimously agreed to adjudicate their claims based solely on the principal outstanding amount. This decision was made to expedite the adjudication and disbursement process. The appellant's representative had confirmed the outstanding principal amount during a meeting, agreeing to the methodology adopted by the Official Liquidator.

In the judgment, it was emphasized that while the funded interest loan should have been considered as outstanding debt, the Official Liquidator's decision to focus only on the principal amount for disbursement was justified. The court noted that accepting the funded interest as payable to the appellant bank would require a reevaluation of interest payable to other secured creditors, disrupting the agreed-upon ratio for fund distribution. The appellant was deemed estopped from challenging the methodology agreed upon earlier, and the court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Official Liquidator's decision.

---