Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could opt to pay duty under Notification No. 9/2002-C.E. in respect of captively used polyjars instead of being compelled to avail captive consumption exemption under Notification No. 10/96-C.E.
Analysis: Polyjars were one of the specified items covered by Notification No. 9/2002-C.E., and the assessee had chosen to pay duty on the goods, take credit of the duty paid, and utilize it for payment on the final product. The exemption for captive consumption was not mandatory, and the assessee could not be forced to adopt a particular exemption notification when the governing notification gave an option. The settled principle applied was that where an exemption notification is available, the assessee cannot be compelled to avail it and may choose the alternative statutory route permitted by the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to opt for Notification No. 9/2002-C.E., and the Revenue's objection failed.
Ratio Decidendi: When two exemption routes are available and the applicable notification confers an option, the assessee cannot be compelled to avail captive consumption exemption and may choose to pay duty under the notification applicable to the goods manufactured.