Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 12% off sitewide! →✨ Enterprise Access - Extra Savings! Contact: 9911796707 →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal decision on Cenvat credit & penalty reduction emphasizes substantiating claims & proper documentation</h1> <h3>RAM POLY FIBRES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., GUNTUR</h3> The Tribunal upheld the denial of a portion of the Cenvat credit, set aside the remaining demand, and reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant in a ... Demand of duty - Availment/utilization of MODVAT credit of CVD paid on HDPE granules - Imposition of penalty - Held that:- On 12-10-1995, the Central Excise Range Superintendent visited the appellant’s factory and conducted physical stock verification of the raw materials and also conducted a scrutiny of statutory records. A quantity of 4,725 Kgs. of HDPE granules of Indian origin was found in the factory and the same was noted in a mahazar; that no evidence of the imported raw materials having been received in the factory was also noted in the same mahazar. In the mahazar, it was also noted that the General Manager of the factory, who was present, stated that a quantity of 686 bags of imported HDPE granules had not been received in the factory but, nevertheless, Modvat credit was taken on that quantity also at the behest of the Management. The General Manager’s inability to produce documentary evidence of actual utilization of any part of the imported granules in the manufacture of HDPE bags was also recorded in the mahazar. Department has not substantiated their case insofar as the MODVAT credit of Rs. 2,51,399.25 is concerned. The total credit taken by the party on the three consignments of HDPE granules covered by the three bills of entry is Rs. 3,63,319.95, out of which credit of Rs. 2,51,399.25 was found to have been utilized. The unutilized MODVAT credit is the difference between these two figures. At best, to this extent, the Revenue’s case can be accepted. In the result, the denial of Cenvat credit to the extent of Rs. 1,11,920.70 is upheld and the rest of the demand raised on the appellant is set aside. In the facts and circumstances of this case, the penalty imposed on the appellant is reduced to Rs. 7,500 - Decided partly in favour of assessee. Issues:Demand of duty arising from MODVAT credit utilization on imported HDPE granules.Analysis:The appeal was filed against the demand of duty of Rs. 3,63,320/- due to the utilization of MODVAT credit on CVD paid on HDPE granules imported by the appellant. The case had been remanded for de novo adjudication in a previous round of litigation. The Assistant Commissioner disallowed the MODVAT credit and ordered recovery, imposing a penalty. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this order, leading to the present appeal.The admitted facts of the case state that the appellant imported HDPE granules in two consignments and took MODVAT credit on them. During a physical verification, discrepancies were noted regarding the receipt of imported raw materials in the factory. The General Manager admitted that Modvat credit was taken on unreceived materials at the behest of the Management. Despite claims of receiving the imported granules, evidence of transportation from the port to the factory was lacking. The Superintendent found no entry of the raw materials from the third bill of entry in the factory records. The Assistant Commissioner's order indicated that the MODVAT credit was utilized for payment of duty on the final product, but the department failed to prove that Indian origin granules were used in manufacturing. The Tribunal held that the department failed to substantiate their case regarding the MODVAT credit utilization, upholding the denial of credit to a certain extent and setting aside the rest of the demand. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced in light of the circumstances.In conclusion, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal by upholding the denial of a portion of the Cenvat credit, setting aside the remaining demand, and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment highlighted the importance of substantiating claims of credit utilization and the necessity of proper documentation and evidence in such cases.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found