Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Duty Calculation on LNG Imports, Rejects Revenue Appeal</h1> The Tribunal concluded that the assessable value in the case was correctly determined based on the quantity of LNG discharged in India at the contracted ... Levy of Customs duty - Valuation – Importation of LNG - Contract price – Held that:- As per the contracts between the buyer and seller transaction value has to be calculated on the basis of the quantity of LNG discharged and Brent rate - There is no evidence on record that any amount over and above the transaction value has been repatriated by asseessee to the seller of the LNG abroad - Relied upon Mangalore Refinery & Petrochem Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, Mangalore [2006 (2) TMI 518 - CESTAT, BANGALORE] Whether there would be any requirement for determination of the quantity of the goods as the basis for levy of customs duty would be the transaction value, i.e. invoice price and not the quantity – Circular No. 96/2002-Customs, dated 27-12-2002 - Amendment in circular – Levy of duty at specific rate - Held that:- Board’s Circular No. 96/2002-Customs, dated 27-12-2002 was amended to the extent where customs duty is leviable at specific rate - Wherever the customs duty is leviable at specific rate the assessment of bulk liquid cargo should be based on the determination of quantity for levy of customs duty - The European Countries are also following the valuation system based on GATT - Assessable value in the present imports was correctly determined on the basis of quantity of LNG discharged in India at the contracted price arrived at on the basis of an agreement - Accordingly, appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected – Decided against Revenue. Issues Involved:1. Basis for final assessment of LNG quantity.2. Determination of unit price for duty calculation.3. Applicability of transaction value and relevant contracts.4. Relevant case laws and circulars supporting the assessment basis.Detailed Analysis:1. Basis for Final Assessment of LNG Quantity:The primary issue revolves around whether the final assessment of LNG quantity should be based on the quantity declared in the Bills of Lading and Load Port Ullage report or the quantity discharged at the Indian port. The Revenue argued that the quantity declared in the Bills of Lading should be taken for duty purposes as there was no flow meter available at the port of import, and the quantity cannot be based on the post-discharge survey report. The Respondent, however, contended that the quantity and value received and paid should be determined as per the contracts, which specify the quantity unloaded at the buyer's facilities.2. Determination of Unit Price for Duty Calculation:The Revenue contended that the unit price should be based on the provisional unit price declared in the Bills of Entry. They argued that the unit price remained unchanged in some cases while it was reduced in others, which was incorrect. The Respondent argued that the duty was correctly paid on the quantity and price shown in the final invoices, which is the transaction value as per the contracts.3. Applicability of Transaction Value and Relevant Contracts:Clauses 7 and 16 of the Master (Ex-Ship) LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement and Clause 12 of the Confirmation Notice between the contracting parties were crucial. These clauses stipulated that the transaction value should be calculated based on the quantity of LNG discharged and the Brent rate. The judgment emphasized that there was no evidence of any amount over and above the transaction value being repatriated by the Respondent to the seller abroad.4. Relevant Case Laws and Circulars Supporting the Assessment Basis:The Respondent relied on several case laws and CBEC circulars to support their argument that the quantity delivered should be the basis for assessment. Notable references included:- Mangalore Refinery & Petrochem. Ltd. Vs CC Mangalore [2006 (205) ELT 753 (Tri.-Bang.)], which emphasized that the transaction value should be based on the quantity received in the shore tanks.- Circular No. 6/2006-Cus. dt. 12.1.2006 and Circular No. 96/2002-Cus. dt. 27.12.2002, which clarified that for bulk liquid cargo, the shore tank receipt quantity should be the basis for customs duty assessment.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessable value in the present imports was correctly determined based on the quantity of LNG discharged in India at the contracted price as per the agreement. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected, affirming that the duty should be paid based on the transaction value derived from the final invoices and the actual quantity unloaded at the Indian port.Judgment Pronouncement:The operative part of the order was pronounced in the Court on 27.3.2014, confirming the decision to base the assessment on the quantity discharged and the transaction value as per the contractual agreements.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found