Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Deemed Dividend Income for Assessment Years

The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision to delete additions of deemed dividend income under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Tribunal found that the loans were advanced in the ordinary course of business by M/s Shivalik Dairies Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing that lending money was a substantial part of its business activities. The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeals, concluding that the transactions did not meet the criteria for deemed dividends as per Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of additions made on account of deemed dividend income under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Additions on Account of Deemed Dividend Income:

Background and Context:
The Department appealed against the CIT (A)'s decision to delete additions of Rs. 32 lac for Assessment Year 2008-09 and Rs. 20 lac for Assessment Year 2009-10, which were made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as deemed dividend income under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The AO noted that the assessee company received loans from M/s Shivalik Dairies Pvt. Ltd., where the major shareholders of the assessee company had substantial interest.

Arguments by the Department:
The Department argued that the CIT (A) erred in deleting the additions, failing to consider the Finance Act, 1987, which changed the definition of 'deemed dividend' under Section 2(22)(e). According to the Department, the loans received by the assessee company should be considered deemed income as the shareholders had substantial interest in both entities. The Department emphasized that all conditions prescribed by Section 2(22)(e) were satisfied, thus justifying the AO's treatment of the loans as deemed dividends.

Arguments by the Assessee:
The assessee contended that the CIT (A)'s orders were well-reasoned and that the loans were advanced by M/s Shivalik Dairies Pvt. Ltd. in the ordinary course of its business, where lending money was a substantial part of its business. The assessee cited the case of 'CIT vs. Bhopal Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd.' to support that the payment must be made to a registered shareholder to attract Section 2(22)(e).

Tribunal's Findings:
The Tribunal noted that it was undisputed that the loans were advanced in the ordinary course of business by M/s Shivalik Dairies Pvt. Ltd., which had no other business activity from FY 2007-08 to FY 2010-11 except lending money. The Tribunal found that the AO failed to consider the detailed business activities and the financial records of M/s Shivalik Dairies Pvt. Ltd., which showed 100% income from lending.

Legal Precedents:
The Tribunal referenced several legal precedents:
- 'CIT vs. V.S. Shiva Subramaniam': Loans from a money-lending company to a shareholder cannot be treated as deemed dividends.
- 'CIT vs. Parley Plastics Ltd.': Loans made in the ordinary course of business by a lending company are not regarded as dividends.
- 'CIT vs. Gopal Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd.': Section 2(22)(e) requires the payment to be made to a registered shareholder.
- 'CIT vs. MCC Marketing (P) Ltd.': Loans to a non-shareholder company are not covered under the definition of 'dividend' in Section 2(22)(e).

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, stating that the loans were advanced in the ordinary course of business and the lending of money was a substantial part of M/s Shivalik Dairies Pvt. Ltd.'s business. The Tribunal found no merit in the Department's arguments and dismissed both appeals, affirming that the transactions did not fall under the purview of deemed dividend as per Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.

Order Pronounced:
The order was pronounced in the open court on 04.04.2014, dismissing both appeals filed by the Department.

---