Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT directs reassessment of tax issues under Sections 194C and 172, stressing compliance with legal provisions</h1> The ITAT allowed the Revenue's appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the CIT(A) for reassessment of issues related to Sections 194C and ... Deletion of demand raised u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act – Applicability of section 194C of the Act – assessee is making payment to some Indian subsidiaries of foreign shipping company without deducting TDS under Section 194C - Revenue contended that the assessee company is an Indian arm of a multinational company Expeditors International - The assessee is engaged in the business of supplying chain management, logistics and freight forwarding which is related to movement of goods and cargo within India or outside India by road, rail, air or ship - During the course of survey at the assessee’s premises, it is seen that the assessee is making payment to some Indian subsidiaries of foreign shipping company without deducting TDS under Section 194C of the Act. Held that:- Section 194C is applicable to the payment made by the assessee to the subsidiaries of foreign shipping and airline companies - CIT(A) misunderstood the order of the AO and recorded the finding that the AO has accepted the plea of the assessee that Section 194C is not applicable in the case of the appellant and only Section 172 is applicable - In the relied upon by the assessee, the assessee has furnished the confirmation from all the agents for filing of the return u/s 172 of the act - No such confirmations were produced – thus, the order fo the CIT(A) set aside and the matter is remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication – Decided in favour of Revenue. Issues:Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order for AY 2006-07 to 2011-12 - Applicability of Sections 194C and 172, CBDT circulars, case laws, and relief granted.Analysis:1. The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s order deleting demands under Sections 201(1)/201(1A) of the IT Act, 1961, arguing that Section 194C applies to payments made to Indian subsidiaries of foreign shipping companies without TDS deduction. The Assessing Officer found Section 194C applicable, contrary to CIT(A)'s understanding. The CIT(A) relied on Circulars and case laws to support non-applicability of Section 194C, emphasizing Section 172's relevance for foreign shipping companies.2. The assessee contended that Section 172, a self-contained tax code, governs payments to foreign shipping companies, exempting them from Section 194C. Referring to Circulars and legal precedents, the assessee argued against TDS deduction for such payments. The CIT(A) concurred, highlighting the necessity of tax payment by shipping companies under Section 172 for movement permissions.3. Discrepancies arose between the Assessing Officer's and CIT(A)'s interpretations regarding the applicability of Sections 194C and 172. The Assessing Officer deemed Section 194C applicable to payments to non-resident shipping company agents, while the CIT(A) favored Section 172 for such transactions. The ITAT found the CIT(A)'s decision flawed due to misinterpretation, prompting a remand for reconsideration in alignment with legal provisions and precedents.4. The ITAT directed a fresh adjudication by the CIT(A), emphasizing the need for a correct understanding of the Assessing Officer's order and adherence to legal principles. The decision aimed at ensuring justice by allowing both parties adequate hearing opportunities. The ITAT's decision to set aside the CIT(A)'s order for reassessment underscored the importance of aligning judgments with statutory provisions and relevant legal precedents.5. Ultimately, the ITAT deemed the Revenue's appeals allowed for statistical purposes, signaling a remand for the CIT(A) to reevaluate the issues concerning Sections 194C and 172, CBDT circulars, and case laws to arrive at a legally sound decision. The ITAT's comprehensive analysis and remand decision aimed at resolving the discrepancies and ensuring a just and legally compliant outcome in the tax dispute.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found