Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellants in Franchise Agreement dispute The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a Franchise Agreement with M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellants in Franchise Agreement dispute
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a Franchise Agreement with M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading Co. Ltd. The demand for business auxiliary service was set aside based on a previous decision. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appeals were granted, with the appellants potentially receiving consequential relief if applicable.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai decided in favor of the appellants in a case involving a Franchise Agreement with M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading Co. Ltd. The Tribunal set aside the demand for business auxiliary service, citing a previous decision. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting the appellants consequential relief if applicable. (2014 (3) TMI 564 - CESTAT MUMBAI)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.