1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellants in Franchise Agreement dispute</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a Franchise Agreement with M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading ... Demand of service tax - Business auxiliary service - Held that:- appellants are owner of property and entered into an agreement titled as ‘Franchise Agreement' with M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading Co. Ltd. to run café, making and selling coffee and other eatables under the brand name 'Café Coffee Day' - Following the previous decisions of this Tribunal - Decided in favour of assessee. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai decided in favor of the appellants in a case involving a Franchise Agreement with M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading Co. Ltd. The Tribunal set aside the demand for business auxiliary service, citing a previous decision. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting the appellants consequential relief if applicable. (2014 (3) TMI 564 - CESTAT MUMBAI)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
