Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court clarifies COD clearance not needed for non-govt appeals.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TRICHY Versus COMBUSTION ENGINEERING</h3> The High Court held that Committee on Disputes (COD) clearance is not necessary for appeals filed by non-government entities like Combustion Engineering ... Appeal by Department – Whether COD clearance is not required where a foreign company is represented by PSU as an agent – Held that revenue contention was correct and allowed. COD clearance is required only where there exists a dispute between Ministry and Ministry of GOI, Ministry and PSU Issues Involved:1. Whether COD clearance is necessary for an appeal filed by a non-government entity.2. Whether the assessee represented by a government entity requires COD clearance.3. Whether COD clearance is necessary when the agent representing the foreign collaborator is a government entity.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Whether COD clearance is necessary for an appeal filed by a non-government entity:The primary issue revolves around whether the Income Tax Tribunal was correct in holding that Committee on Disputes (COD) clearance is necessary for entertaining an appeal filed by Combustion Engineering Inc. (USA), which is not a government department. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue on the grounds that COD approval had not been obtained. However, the Revenue contended that COD approval is essential only for disputes between government entities and not for cases involving non-resident assessees represented by a government undertaking. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal without considering the merits was challenged, arguing that the COD certificate is not essential in this context.2. Whether the assessee represented by a government entity requires COD clearance:The Tribunal held that since the assessee, Combustion Engineering Inc. (USA), was represented by Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), a public sector undertaking, COD clearance was necessary. The Revenue argued that BHEL is merely a representative assessee and not the principal party in the dispute. The Tribunal's reliance on the requirement of COD clearance for the representative assessee was questioned, emphasizing that the actual assessee is a non-resident foreign company, and thus, COD clearance should not be mandated.3. Whether COD clearance is necessary when the agent representing the foreign collaborator is a government entity:The Tribunal's decision was based on the premise that since BHEL, a government entity, represented the foreign collaborator, COD clearance was required. The Revenue countered this by stating that the dispute pertains to the assessment of Combustion Engineering Inc. (USA) and not BHEL. The Tribunal's interpretation of the Supreme Court's direction in the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) case was deemed a misconception, as the requirement for COD clearance applies to disputes involving government entities and public sector undertakings, not to cases where a non-resident assessee is represented by a government entity.Judgment Summary:The High Court concluded that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of lacking COD approval. The court clarified that COD clearance is necessary only for disputes between government entities and public sector undertakings, as per the Supreme Court's direction in the ONGC case. Since Combustion Engineering Inc. (USA) is a non-resident foreign company and not a public sector undertaking, the requirement for COD clearance does not apply. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal without considering the merits was based on a misconception of the Supreme Court's directive.The High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order, and directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal on file and dispose of it on merits. This judgment underscores that the requirement for COD clearance is specific to disputes involving government entities and public sector undertakings and does not extend to cases where a non-resident assessee is represented by a government entity.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found