Line production services outside India were not taxable absent a permanent establishment, so no withholding obligation arose.

Line production services rendered outside India were treated as work covered by section 194C of the Income-tax Act, and were not characterised as fees for technical services, royalty, independent personal services, or other income. Because the recipient had no permanent establishment in India, the receipts were not chargeable to tax in India. As the underlying payment was not taxable in India, no obligation to deduct tax at source arose under section 195. The ruling followed the applicant's earlier similar case and was in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the line production services paid for by the applicant were taxable as fees for technical services, royalty, independent personal services, other income, or business profits, and whether the resulting payments were chargeable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment and liable to withholding tax under section 195.

Analysis: The services rendered were line production services provided outside India. On the facts, they were treated as work covered by section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Following the earlier ruling in the applicant's own case on similar services, the payments were not characterised as fees for technical services or royalty, and in the absence of a permanent establishment in India the receipts were not chargeable to tax in India. As the underlying payment was not taxable in India, no obligation to deduct tax at source arose under section 195.

Conclusion: The payments were held not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment and not subject to withholding tax under section 195; the ruling was therefore in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Line production services treated as work under section 194C are not taxable in India absent a permanent establishment, and no withholding obligation arises under section 195.

---