Extended limitation under Central Excise law upheld where suppression of facts supported invocation of the show cause notice.

The extended limitation period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was held invocable where the assessee had taken Cenvat credit and cleared goods without properly disclosing the factual position concerning the activity and the receipt of machines for repair and modification. The adjudicating authority and the appellate authority had recorded findings of suppression, and the Tribunal had not adequately addressed those findings. On that basis, the Court held that the show cause notice was not time-barred and sustained invocation of the extended period, setting aside the Tribunal's view on limitation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be invoked on the basis of suppression of facts in relation to the availment of Cenvat credit and clearance of goods.

Analysis: The record showed that the assessee had claimed Cenvat credit and cleared the goods while the factual position regarding the nature of the activity and the receipt of the machines for repair and modification was not properly disclosed. The adjudicating authority and the appellate authority had recorded findings of suppression, and the Tribunal had not adequately dealt with those findings. The Court held that the material justified invocation of the extended period and that the show cause notice was not barred by limitation.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the Tribunal's view on limitation was set aside.

---