TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Ahmedabad: Interest Disallowance Criteria & Remand Directive for Fair Decision</h1> <h3>Vikshara Trading & Inv. (P) Ltd. Versus ACIT, Cir. 8 Ahmedabad</h3> The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad addressed issues regarding the disallowance of interest payments and interest-free advances across three assessment ... Addition made to interest payment – Disallowance of Interest free loans - Held that:- There is no finding recorded by the revenue authorities that whether the reserves and surplus of the assessee for the relevant year were more than the interest free advance of the assessee – the matter remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication to decide the issue of disallowance of interest after recording a clear cut finding with regard to the amount of reserves and surplus available with the assessee and the amount of interest free advance made – Decided in favour of Assessee. Issues:1. Disallowance of interest payment based on reserves and surplus.2. Disallowance of interest on interest-free advances.3. Disallowance made under section 41(1).Issue 1: Disallowance of interest payment based on reserves and surplus:The assessee challenged the disallowance of interest payment of Rs.13,15,697, arguing that there was no justification for confirming the disallowance based on assumption and presumption without nexus proof. The counsel contended that reserves and surplus exceeded the interest-free advance, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal noted the lack of a finding on whether reserves and surplus exceeded the interest-free advance. Considering the latest decision of the Gujarat High Court, the Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the disallowance issue, emphasizing that no disallowance should be made if reserves and surplus cover the interest-free advances. The Tribunal highlighted that the continuity of interest-free advances from previous years is not decisive if reserves exceed advances.Issue 2: Disallowance of interest on interest-free advances:In the appeal for the assessment year 2008-09, the assessee contested the disallowance of Rs.9,31,165 due to interest-free loans given to parties. Both parties agreed that the facts were similar to the previous year. The Tribunal, in line with its decision for the earlier year, remanded the issue to the AO for fresh consideration, mirroring the directions given for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal instructed the AO to re-evaluate the disallowance with similar guidelines as provided earlier.Issue 3: Disallowance made under section 41(1):The sole ground in the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 was the confirmation of disallowance by the AO at Rs.8,10,476. Similar to the previous years, both parties acknowledged the identical nature of the case. Following the pattern of the earlier assessments, the Tribunal directed the issue back to the AO for a fresh decision, maintaining consistency with the directions issued for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad addressed multiple issues related to the disallowance of interest payments and interest-free advances across three assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of reserves and surplus exceeding interest-free advances to justify disallowance. By remanding the issues to the AO for fresh consideration with specific directives, the Tribunal aimed to ensure a fair and just decision in line with legal precedents and relevant case laws.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
