Employee medical reimbursements not taxable as perquisites under Income-tax Act The High Court of Bombay held that medical expenses reimbursed by the assessee to its employees are not 'perquisites' for tax purposes under section ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Employee medical reimbursements not taxable as perquisites under Income-tax Act
The High Court of Bombay held that medical expenses reimbursed by the assessee to its employees are not 'perquisites' for tax purposes under section 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, following precedent from a prior case.
The High Court of Bombay ruled that medical expenses reimbursed by the assessee to its employees should not be considered as 'perquisites' for tax purposes under section 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the court's previous ruling in CIT v. Indokem Pvt. Ltd. [1981] 132 ITR 125.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.