Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation and development rebate on the interest capitalised for the relevant assessment years. (ii) Whether, for computing the deficiency under section 80J(3), rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 applied instead of rule 19.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation and development rebate on the interest capitalised for the relevant assessment years.
Analysis: The first question was covered by existing authority accepting that capitalised interest formed part of the actual cost for the purpose of depreciation and development rebate.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether, for computing the deficiency under section 80J(3), rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 applied instead of rule 19.
Analysis: The computation had to be made with reference to section 80J and the corresponding rule applicable to that provision. Since section 84 had ceased to operate and section 80J had come into force, rule 19A governed the computation under section 80J. The Court accepted the view consistent with the applicable precedent and the statutory transition.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Both reference questions were answered against the Revenue and the assessee succeeded on the entire reference.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a new statutory provision has replaced an earlier one, the computation mechanism prescribed for the new provision governs the issue, and capitalised interest may form part of the base for depreciation and development rebate where recognised by the applicable legal rule.