Appellant must deposit additional Rs.15,00,000 within 8 weeks to stay recovery during appeal The Tribunal accepted the appellant's offer to deposit Rs.15,00,000 within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs.4,00,000 already paid, to waive the balance ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellant must deposit additional Rs.15,00,000 within 8 weeks to stay recovery during appeal
The Tribunal accepted the appellant's offer to deposit Rs.15,00,000 within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs.4,00,000 already paid, to waive the balance of dues and stay recovery during the appeal's pendency. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of both appeals without further notice, with a compliance report due on 03.06.2013.
Issues: Seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under section 11AC of Central Excise Act.
Analysis: The appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs.1.05 crores and an equal penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, along with a penalty of Rs.10,00,000 on the Director of the applicant. The appellant's advocate argued that the fabrication of various iron articles within the factory premises was considered non-excisable due to the absence of manufacturing activity, relying on precedents like Aruna Industries Vishakhapatnam and Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. However, it was acknowledged that post the decision in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. case, these precedents were no longer valid. The advocate contended that a significant portion of the demand was time-barred, offering to deposit an additional Rs.15,00,000 on top of the Rs.4,00,000 already paid during the investigation.
Analysis: The Advocate for the appellant highlighted the historical debate on the excisability of fabricating various items, emphasizing that prior to the Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. case, the issue was contentious and often decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the issue was settled only after the larger Bench decision in the Mahindra & Mahindra case. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's offer to deposit Rs.15,00,000 within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs.4,00,000 already deposited. It was ruled that upon this deposit, the balance amount of dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Failure to comply with the deposit requirement would lead to the dismissal of both appeals without further notice, with a compliance report due on 03.06.2013.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.