Predeposit modification in CFL classification dispute rejected; interim stay terms remained operative pending final factual examination.

The dispute concerned whether the applicant could obtain modification of a stay order that required predeposit and granted waiver of the balance demand. The Tribunal noted that the issue depended on the classification and nature of the imported CFLs, which had to be examined on catalogue, specifications and other factual material at final hearing. It also observed that the relevant notification provided different duty treatment for CFLs with choke and without choke, and that the earlier stay order had already considered the matter and fixed the predeposit. The modification request was rejected on the material available for interim consideration, and the predeposit direction remained operative, with time extended for compliance.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to modification of the stay order directing predeposit and waiver of the balance demand.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the controversy turned on the classification and nature of the imported CFLs, which required examination of the catalogue, specifications, and other factual material at the stage of final hearing. It noted that the relevant notification contemplated different duty treatment for CFLs with choke and without choke, and that the earlier stay order had already considered the matter and fixed predeposit. The plea for modification was therefore not accepted on the material placed for interim consideration.

Conclusion: The request for modification of the stay order was rejected, and the predeposit direction remained operative, with extension of time granted for compliance.

---