Purchase tax on scrap used in manufacture upheld, while penalty for incorrect return was deleted.

Purchase tax was held leviable on iron scrap bought from unregistered dealers and used to manufacture rough castings, because the scrap and the finished rough castings were treated as commercially distinct commodities; the fact that the finished goods were also taxed on sale did not remove the purchase tax liability. Penalty for filing an incorrect or incomplete return was not sustained, as the record did not show a deliberate or blameworthy return. The purchase tax issue was decided against the assessee, while the penalty was set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether purchase tax under Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was leviable on iron scrap purchased from unregistered dealers and used in the manufacture of rough castings. (ii) Whether penalty under Section 12(5)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was sustainable on the facts of the case.

Issue (i): Whether purchase tax under Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was leviable on iron scrap purchased from unregistered dealers and used in the manufacture of rough castings.

Analysis: The assessee had purchased scrap iron from unregistered dealers and used it in manufacture. The scrap purchased and the rough castings sold were treated as commercially different commodities. On the admitted facts, the purchases attracted liability under Section 7-A, and the circumstance that the finished goods were also taxable on sale did not displace the purchase tax liability. The Tribunal's reliance on the settled principle governing separate commercial identity of the goods was accepted.

Conclusion: The levy of purchase tax under Section 7-A was upheld and this issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty under Section 12(5)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was sustainable on the facts of the case.

Analysis: Penalty under Section 12(5)(iii) required scrutiny of the nature of the return and the assessee's conduct. The record did not disclose a deliberate or blameworthy filing of an incorrect and incomplete return. In the absence of such material, the penalty could not be sustained merely because the purchase tax demand was upheld.

Conclusion: The penalty under Section 12(5)(iii) was set aside and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The revisions were sustained on the purchase tax issue but relief was granted by deleting the penalty, resulting in partial success for the assessee.

---