Tribunal affirms CIT(A) on disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) & partial relief to assessee

The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and the application of the provisions for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, referring the issue of extra TDS payment for further verification by the AO.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Application of the amended provision of Section 40(a)(ia) for the Assessment Year 2009-10.

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

In the case, the assessee appealed against the order of the ld. C.I.T.(A)- XX, Kolkata regarding the disallowance of Rs.4,61,24,937 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee contended that the disallowance should have been restricted to Rs.2,27,72,701 by considering an extra payment of tax made. The Revenue, on the other hand, challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs.16,51,73,610 on account of expenses for executing contract work under section 40(a)(ia). The Revenue argued that the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) was not applicable for the assessment year 2009-10. The ld. CIT(A) had deleted the disallowance based on the TDS deducted by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) as the TDS amount was deposited before the due date of filing the return, thus allowing the corresponding expenditure.

Issue 2: Application of the amended provision of Section 40(a)(ia) for the Assessment Year 2009-10:

The Revenue contended that the ld. CIT(A) wrongly applied the amended provision of Section 40(a)(ia) which was effective from 01.04.2010, while considering the assessee's claim for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Tribunal noted that even under the unamended provision, if TDS was deductible and deducted before the due date of filing the return, the corresponding expenditure should be allowed. The Tribunal found that the ld. CIT(A) had correctly allowed the expenditure based on the TDS deposited by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and partly allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the issue of extra TDS payment to be verified by the AO.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and the application of the provisions for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, referring the issue of extra TDS payment for further verification by the AO.

---