Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty paid for extraction of coal was includible in the transaction value for levy of excise duty on coal, and whether the appellant should be directed to make a pre-deposit pending further hearing.
Analysis: The Tribunal recorded a prima facie view that royalty formed part of the direct cost incurred to extract coal and bring it to the surface and make it marketable. It held that sale consideration was fixed on the basis of the total cost of extraction, and that excluding royalty would depress the transaction value and prejudice revenue. On that basis, the Tribunal also kept the second count of demand open for later argument and proceeded to require compliance by way of deposit.
Outcome: The Tribunal directed pre-deposit of Rs. 75 lakhs and fixed the matter for compliance and further hearing, while prima facie accepting the Revenue's stand on inclusion of royalty in transaction value.