Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows appeal, directs reexamination of claims. Disallowance under Section 14A not upheld. Goodwill depreciation recognized.</h1> <h3>M/s Just Dial Private Limited Versus Dy. CIT 9 (2), Mumbai</h3> The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to reexamine various claims in accordance with the applicable laws and ... Disallowance u/s 14A - Held that:- The application of Rule 8D is w.e.f. assessment year 2008-09 - The disallowance in this case is to be computed on some reasonable basis - The issue was restored for fresh adjudication. Depreciation on goodwill - Held that:- Following CIT Vs. Smifs Securities Ltd. 2012 (8) TMI 713 - SUPREME COURT - Goodwill has been held to be an asset eligible for depreciation - Decided in favour of assessee. Repair and maintenance expenses - Held that:- The details of expenses incurred, filed by the assessee were not considered by the AO - The issue was restored for fresh adjudication. Website Development Expenses - Held that:- The AO is not entitled to grant deduction on the basis of a letter requesting an amendment to the return filed - The assessee should have filed valid revised return for claiming the expenses - Following Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders (P) Ltd. [2012 (7) TMI 158 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - The issue was restored for fresh adjudication. Issues:1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.2. Claim of depreciation on goodwill.3. Claim of repairs and maintenance expenditure.4. Claim of website development expenses.Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:The appeal concerned the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for the Assessment Year 2007-2008. The AO computed the disallowance at Rs.5,07,520, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The counsel for the assessee argued that Rule 8D was not applicable for the assessment year in question. The Tribunal noted that Rule 8D was applicable from assessment year 2008-09 as per a decision of the jurisdictional High Court. Following this decision, the Tribunal directed the AO to compute a reasonable disallowance without invoking Rule 8D. Ground No.4 was allowed for statistical purposes.Issue 2: Claim of depreciation on goodwill:The AO disallowed the claim of depreciation on goodwill, stating that goodwill is not a depreciable asset. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. However, the counsel for the assessee cited a Supreme Court judgment which held goodwill as an asset eligible for depreciation. The Tribunal agreed with the counsel, directing the AO to allow the claim of depreciation on goodwill in accordance with the law based on the Supreme Court's decision. Ground No.5 was allowed.Issue 3: Claim of repairs and maintenance expenditure:The AO disallowed the repairs and maintenance expenditure incurred by the assessee, considering it as a capital loss due to the premises not being occupied. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance. The counsel argued that the expenses were for renovation of premises intended for business use. The Tribunal found that the AO did not consider all details of the expenses and, in the interest of justice, directed the AO to reexamine the claim after considering all details provided by the assessee. Ground No.6 was allowed for statistical purposes.Issue 4: Claim of website development expenses:The AO did not consider the claim of website development expenses made by the assessee in a letter. The CIT(A) rejected the claim, stating it should have been made through a revised return. The counsel contended that these expenses were business-related and should be allowed. The Tribunal, citing a High Court decision, directed the AO to verify the claim of website development expenses and adjudicate it after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Ground No.7 was allowed for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee and allowed certain grounds for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reexamine various claims in accordance with the applicable laws and precedents.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found