Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of jack assembly, rear visual barrier and carpets supplied separately through the spare parts division was includible in the assessable value of the three-wheelers cleared from the factory.
Analysis: The applicable motor vehicle rules required the vehicle to be equipped with certain items while being used on the road, but they did not mandate that the manufacturer must supply those items along with the vehicle at the time of clearance from the factory. The Tribunal noted that the accessories in question were not supplied with the three-wheelers at the time of removal and that prior decisions had consistently held that the value of tool kits and jack assemblies is not includible in the assessable value of motor vehicles when they are not integral components of the vehicle itself.
Conclusion: The value of the optional accessories was not includible in the assessable value of the three-wheelers, and the demand and penalty could not be sustained.