Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods credit was admissible on the Sulphur Recovery Unit and Standby Sulphur Recovery Unit used in the diesel desulphurisation process, or whether such goods were used exclusively for manufacture of exempted sulphur.
Analysis: The capital goods were installed pursuant to pollution-control requirements and were functionally connected with the diesel hydrogen desulphurisation plant to remove hydrogen sulphide generated in the process. The sulphur produced was only an inevitable by-product, while the essential use of the units was to enable manufacture of marketable high speed diesel meeting the prescribed sulphur limits. On that footing, the units were not treated as capital goods used exclusively for manufacture of an exempted final product.
Conclusion: Capital goods credit was admissible, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded because the disputed units were held to be part of the manufacturing and pollution-control process for dutiable diesel, not machinery used solely for exempt sulphur.
Ratio Decidendi: Where capital goods are installed as an integral and necessary part of a pollution-control linked manufacturing process for a dutiable final product, credit cannot be denied merely because an exempt by-product emerges from that process.