Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (11) TMI 1282 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds business income decision, remands disallowance for further examination The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the A.O.'s determination of business income without set off of depreciation/losses under section 80-IA, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal upholds business income decision, remands disallowance for further examination

                          The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the A.O.'s determination of business income without set off of depreciation/losses under section 80-IA, the assessment of income from house property based on previous rent received, and the reopening of assessments. The tribunal remanded the matter of disallowance under section 14A for further examination based on the assessee's accounts.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Determination of business income without set off of depreciation/losses of eligible units under section 80-IA.
                          2. Assessment of income from house property.
                          3. Disallowance under section 14A.
                          4. Reopening of assessments.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Determination of Business Income Without Set Off of Depreciation/Losses of Eligible Units Under Section 80-IA:

                          The principal issue concerns the determination of business income for the relevant years without allowing the set off of depreciation/losses of the assessee's two units, i.e., Windmill 1 and 2, income from which is eligible for deduction under section 80-IA. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed the set off based on section 80-IA(5), which deems the eligible business to be the only source of income for the relevant years. The assessee argued that section 80-IA(5) should only apply to determine the quantum of deduction under section 80-IA(1) and not for the current year where no deduction was claimed. However, the authorities and the tribunal, relying on decisions like ACIT vs. Gold Mine Shares & Finance (P.) Ltd. and CIT vs. Sonakaya Steering Systems Ltd., upheld the disallowance. The tribunal clarified that the initial assessment year would be the year of commencement of operations, and the losses/depreciation of the eligible units should be carried forward and set off against future profits of the same source to determine the quantum of deduction under section 80-IA.

                          2. Assessment of Income from House Property:

                          For AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, the A.O. assessed income from a property at Bajaj Bhavan, Nariman Point, Mumbai, which remained vacant after the lease expired in April 2004. The assessee argued that the annual letting value (ALV) should be based on the standard rent or municipal ratable value, which was significantly lower than the rent previously received. The tribunal, however, upheld the A.O.'s determination of ALV based on the rent previously received, as there was no evidence to suggest a drastic reduction in rental value. The tribunal also rejected the assessee's claim for vacancy allowance under section 23(1)(c) since the property was not let out during the relevant years.

                          3. Disallowance Under Section 14A:

                          The A.O. made a disallowance under section 14A with reference to Rule 8D, which the tribunal upheld for AY 2008-09, as Rule 8D was applicable from that year. For earlier years, the tribunal directed the A.O. to allow the assessee to show that it had sufficient funds to finance the tax-exempt investments, and if proven, no disallowance for interest expenditure would arise. The tribunal emphasized that the matter is factual and should be examined based on the assessee's accounts.

                          4. Reopening of Assessments:

                          The assessee challenged the reopening of assessments for AYs 2005-06 and 2006-07, arguing it was based on a change of opinion. The tribunal rejected this argument, noting that the reassessment was initiated within four years from the end of the relevant assessment years, and there was no evidence that the A.O. had previously considered the issue of section 80-IA(5). The tribunal found that the reassessment proceedings were rightly initiated as there was a "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment.

                          Conclusion:
                          The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the A.O.'s determination of business income without set off of depreciation/losses under section 80-IA, the assessment of income from house property based on previous rent received, and the reopening of assessments. The tribunal remanded the matter of disallowance under section 14A for further examination based on the assessee's accounts.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found