Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rice manufactured from paddy by units certified and financed by the Uttar Pradesh Khadi and Gramodyog Board was covered by the trade tax exemption under the relevant Government Orders, and whether reassessment proceedings and notices for the assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 could be sustained on the basis of the later exclusion introduced by the Government Order dated 30.09.2004.
Analysis: The exemption under the Government Order dated 31.01.1985, as amended by Notification No. 709 dated 27.02.1997, extended to the products of Khadi Gram Udyog Board units and used the expression relating to hulling, cutting, trimming, processing, packaging and marketing of cereals. The later exclusion of "rice and its by-product manufactured from paddy" by the Government Order dated 30.09.2004 was treated as a substantive exclusion and not as a mere clarification. Accordingly, the exclusion could not be applied retrospectively to earlier assessment years, and reassessment under Section 21(2) on that basis was not permissible for the period in question.
Conclusion: The challenge succeeded. The reassessment permission and consequential notices for the assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 were unsustainable and were quashed, in favour of the assessee.