Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning alleged violation of the conditions of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. in relation to imported helicopter operations.
Analysis: The imported helicopter had been brought in under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. for non-scheduled passenger operations. The disputed condition had later been substituted by Notification No. 21/2011-Cus., which recognised inter-utilisation of aircraft for non-scheduled passenger services and charter services. The Tribunal also noted that on the same issue there were two competing views in its earlier decisions, and that the matter was already pending before the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed till disposal of the appeal.