TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai: Predeposit waiver, imported goods classification, compliance timeline, appeal hearing</h1> <h3>Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. and N. Jamnadas & Co. Versus Commissioner of Customs, (Airport & Cargo) Chennai</h3> Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. and N. Jamnadas & Co. Versus Commissioner of Customs, (Airport & Cargo) Chennai - TMI Issues:1. Application for waiver of predeposit of duty, penalty, and interest.2. Classification of imported goods under Chapter Heading 71.08 or Chapter 97.05.3. Discrepancy in declarations regarding the imported goods' nature and value.Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to applications for waiver of predeposit of duty, penalty, and interest arising from a common order. The Appellant sought waiver of duty amounting to Rs.1,30,44,357/- and penalty. The Commissioner confirmed a duty demand of Rs.25,27,89,159.00 on M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. and Rs.1,30,44,357.00 on the Applicant. The Tribunal had previously waived pre-deposit of penalty on an appeal filed by M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. The Applicant argued that the imported goods were silver and gold coins and medallions, classifiable under Chapter Heading 71.08, while Revenue contended they had numismatic value and were classifiable under Chapter 97.05.2. The dispute centered around the classification of the imported goods. The Applicant claimed the goods were silver and gold coins and medallions falling under Chapter Heading 71.08, supported by a notification. On the other hand, Revenue argued that the goods had numismatic value and were classified under Chapter 97.05. The Tribunal noted that the goods were specially ordered and freshly minted in Germany for commemorative events, with the manufacturer confirming no numismatic value. However, Revenue pointed to declarations indicating rare collections with higher value than usual.3. The discrepancy in declarations regarding the imported goods' nature and value was a key point of contention. The Applicant maintained that the goods had no numismatic value and were imported in large quantities for specific purposes. They highlighted that ICICI Bank Ltd. had already deposited the demanded duty amount. Revenue, on the contrary, emphasized the declarations in the Airway Bill indicating rare collections with higher value. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit a further amount of Rs.15,00,000/- within a specified timeline, with the predeposit of the remaining duty, interest, and penalty waived subject to compliance. The appeals were scheduled for a hearing after the compliance deadline.This detailed analysis outlines the issues of waiver of predeposit, classification of imported goods, and discrepancies in declarations addressed in the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
