Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the demand, interest and penalty was required where the service tax was paid later by the service provider under an invoice described as supplementary and the recipient had availed credit on that basis.
Analysis: The disputed services were admittedly received and used in relation to the manufacture of the final products. The credit was taken on service tax paid subsequently after audit had detected non-payment by the service provider. The provision relied upon by the department for denying credit on supplementary invoices was prima facie noted to be applicable to inputs and capital goods, while the comparable restriction for input services was stated to have been introduced only from 1.4.2011. In these circumstances, and in light of the cited tribunal decisions, the assessee was held to have a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of the demand, interest and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeal, in favour of the assessee.