Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute relating to valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The dispute concerned excise valuation of cookies supplied in bulk to institutional customers. The appellant relied on earlier settlement proceedings and on a Supreme Court decision to contend that valuation under Section 4A applied. The Revenue relied on the Madras High Court decision setting aside the settlement outcome and on the amended Rule 34(a) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. On the record before it, the Tribunal held that the appellant had not established a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of duty, interest and penalty, though excess payment made in relation to one show cause notice was noticed.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to make a further deposit of Rs. 8,00,000, and on such deposit the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed during pendency of the appeal.