Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subscription fees paid for access to the research website constituted royalty for imparting information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill and were taxable under the domestic law and the India-UK tax treaty.
Analysis: The access arrangement was held to be a restricted licence to use proprietary research products and confidential user names and passwords, not mere public information. The information was segmented, specialised, subject to restrictive covenants against disclosure, copying, sublicensing and unauthorised access, and was made available only for a fee under an agreement. On those facts, the payment was found to be for specialised technical information and not for general information available to the public at large. The tribunal distinguished the authorities relied on by the assessee on the ground that they involved materially different facts.
Conclusion: The subscription fee was held to be royalty within section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and article 13(3) of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and the addition was upheld against the assessee.