Modvat credit on steel items for machinery support structures was admissible under the pre-amendment capital goods definition.

During the relevant period, the pre-substitution definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q applied, covering machines, machinery and plant. The later explanation introducing specific tariff headings was inserted only by Notification No. 14/1996-CE (N.T.) dated 23/7/96, so the amendment did not govern the period from November 1994 to August 1995. On that basis, supporting structures for machinery fell within the concept of plant, and MS angles, channels, sections and bars used for such structures qualified for Modvat credit. The earlier assumption in the final order about the effective date of amendment was incorrect, so rectification was permitted and the order was modified accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Modvat credit dispute relating to MS angles, channels, sections and bars used for supporting structures of machinery during the period November 1994 to August 1995 was wrongly decided on an erroneous understanding of the amendment to Rule 57Q, so as to justify rectification of the final order.

Analysis: During the relevant period, the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q covered machines, machinery and plant. The subsequent substitution of the explanation introducing specific tariff headings was made only by Notification No. 14/1996-CE (N.T.) dated 23/7/96, and not from 16/3/95. Since the dispute period fell before that substitution, the earlier definition applied. On that basis, the supporting structures for machinery fell within the concept of plant, and the steel items used for such supporting structures were eligible for Modvat credit. The earlier factual assumption in the final order regarding the effective date of amendment was therefore incorrect.

Conclusion: The rectification application was allowed, and the final order was modified to hold that Modvat credit on MS angles, channels, sections and bars used for supporting structures of machinery during the relevant period was admissible.

---