Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes, issues remanded for fresh examination. Genuine purchases still subject to disallowance.</h1> <h3>M/s RAJA & CO Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX</h3> M/s RAJA & CO Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - TMI Issues Involved:1. Delay in filing the appeal.2. Disallowance made under section 40A(3) in respect of purchase of rice.3. Disallowance made under section 40A(3) in respect of freight charges.4. Disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) in respect of freight charges for non-deduction of tax at source.5. Disallowance of interest on capital - Rs.92,668/-.6. Disallowance of interest expenses - Rs.59,441/-.7. Disallowance of loss on sale of car - Rs.24,076/- (dismissed as not pressed).Detailed Analysis:1. Delay in Filing the Appeal:The appeal was barred by a limitation of 198 days. The assessee filed a petition to condone the delay, stating that the delay was due to pursuing a rectification petition before the first appellate authority. The Tribunal found the reasons sufficient and condoned the delay, admitting the appeal. The Tribunal clarified that it is not legally tenable to condone the delay for only one issue when the delay pertains to the filing of the appeal itself.2. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) for Purchase of Rice:The assessing officer disallowed 20% of the payments made in cash exceeding Rs.20,000/- for the purchase of rice, amounting to Rs.1,04,66,883/-. The assessee contended that rice is an agricultural produce covered by Rule 6DD(e) exceptions and that purchases were made through agents covered by Rule 6DD(k). The Tribunal found that payments were made to dealers and not to cultivators or growers, failing the conditions of Rule 6DD(e). The Tribunal also found no merit in the contention that purchases were through agents, as the dealers acted independently. The Tribunal held that genuine purchases are still subject to disallowance under section 40A(3) and that the amendment by Finance Act 2008, effective from 1.4.2009, is not retrospective. The issue was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination.3. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) for Freight Charges:The Tribunal noted that the principles discussed for section 40A(3) regarding purchases apply to freight charges as well. The issue was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination in light of the Tribunal's discussions.4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Freight Charges:The assessee argued that there was no privity of contract with lorry owners as they were engaged by rice suppliers. The Tribunal held that the nature of the contract should be determined based on the agreement terms between the supplier and the assessee. The issue was remanded to the assessing officer to ascertain the responsibility for delivery and the applicability of section 40(a)(ia) based on the agreement terms.5. Disallowance of Interest on Capital - Rs.92,668/-:The assessing officer disallowed interest paid to a partner due to a net debit balance in the aggregate capital account of all partners. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance, agreeing with the CIT(A) that interest should only be payable on credit balances and that the partnership deed supported this view.6. Disallowance of Interest Expenses - Rs.59,441/-:The assessing officer computed notional interest on the net debit balance in partners' capital accounts but the CIT(A) restricted the addition to the actual interest paid to the bank. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the interest paid to the bank could not be allowed as a business expenditure due to the net debit balance in partners' capital accounts.7. Disallowance of Loss on Sale of Car - Rs.24,076/-:The ground relating to the disallowance of loss on the sale of the car was dismissed as not pressed by the assessee.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination based on the Tribunal's detailed discussions. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced on 22.3.2013.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found