Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (8) TMI 412 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal affirms assessee's shares income classification, emphasizes genuine intention, directs re-examination of disallowance. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's classification of income from the sale of shares as short-term capital gain, emphasizing the genuine intention and ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal affirms assessee's shares income classification, emphasizes genuine intention, directs re-examination of disallowance.

                            The Tribunal upheld the assessee's classification of income from the sale of shares as short-term capital gain, emphasizing the genuine intention and treatment of shares as investments. The Tribunal rejected the revenue's challenge regarding the allowance of payment of security transaction tax and directed a re-examination of the disallowance under Section 14A based on principles laid out in a relevant case law. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's cross-objection for statistical purposes.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Classification of income from the sale of shares as short-term capital gain versus business income.
                            2. Allowance of payment of security transaction tax.
                            3. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Classification of Income from Sale of Shares:
                            The primary issue revolves around whether the income of Rs. 68,06,698/- from the sale of shares should be treated as short-term capital gain or business income. The assessee, a registered sub-broker with SEBI, declared this income as short-term capital gain, supported by the classification of shares as investments in its books. The Assessing Officer (AO) contested this, arguing that the transactions were in the nature of trading, thus should be treated as business income. The AO emphasized the high frequency and volume of transactions, and the pattern of investments over three years, which he believed indicated trading activity.

                            The CIT (A) sided with the assessee, noting that the company maintained separate portfolios for investment and trading, as recognized by CBDT Circular No. 4/2007. The CIT (A) highlighted that the assessee's books of accounts consistently reflected this separation, with investments shown in the balance sheet and trading stock listed under current assets. The investments were not funded by loans, and the shares were valued at cost, supporting the claim of investment. The CIT (A) also referenced multiple judicial precedents supporting the assessee's stance.

                            Upon appeal, the Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, affirming that the assessee's intention and treatment of shares as investments were genuine. The Tribunal noted the consistent classification in the books, the absence of borrowed funds for investments, and the resolutions passed by the Board of Directors authorizing such investments. The Tribunal applied various tests from judicial precedents to ascertain the nature of transactions, concluding that the assessee's activities aligned with investment rather than trading.

                            2. Allowance of Payment of Security Transaction Tax:
                            The revenue contended that the CIT (A) erred in allowing the payment of security transaction tax amounting to Rs. 75,346/-. However, it was found that the assessee did not press this issue before the CIT (A), and thus, the CIT (A) did not delete this addition. The Tribunal clarified that the deduction of security transaction tax is not admissible once the claim of short-term capital gain is accepted. Consequently, this ground was rejected.

                            3. Disallowance under Section 14A:
                            The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 4,85,543/- made under Section 14A, arguing that the AO computed this disallowance using Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, which is applicable prospectively from AY 2008-09, as held by the Delhi High Court in Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT. The Tribunal agreed that Rule 8D could not be applied for the assessment year in question (2006-07) and directed the AO to re-adjudicate the issue based on reasonableness and the principles laid out in the Maxopp case, examining the accounts to identify any specific expenditure related to earning exempt income.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's cross-objection for statistical purposes, directing a re-examination of the disallowance under Section 14A. The order was pronounced in the open Court on 8/08/2013.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found