CESTAT Chennai: Pre-deposit for Appeal Allowed, Manpower Supply Services

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai allowed the Revenue's application to change the cause title in the ST-5 Form. It determined that the services provided by the applicant to software companies constituted manpower supply, requiring a pre-deposit for appeal admission. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the tax exemption claim for services provided to SEZ units. The issue of the limitation period for the demand of service tax was not explicitly addressed. A pre-deposit of Rs.50,00,000 was ordered for appeal consideration, with subsequent compliance requirements specified.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Change of cause title in ST-5 Form
2. Nature of services provided by the applicant - manpower supply or information technology services
3. Taxability of services provided to SEZ units
4. Limitation period for demand of service tax
5. Pre-deposit of dues for appeal consideration

Analysis:

Issue 1: Change of cause title in ST-5 Form
The Revenue filed a miscellaneous application seeking a change in the cause title to reflect the respondent as 'Commissioner of Service Tax Chennai' instead of 'Commissioner of LTU Chennai' in ST-5 Form. The Tribunal allowed the application considering the applicant's registration with the Commissioner of Service Tax Chennai. The change was permitted for all future proceedings, and the miscellaneous application was allowed.

Issue 2: Nature of services provided by the applicant
A dispute arose regarding whether the services provided by the applicant to software companies like M/s. TCS Ltd and M/s. Infosys Ltd constituted manpower supply or information technology services. The Department contended that the services were manpower supply, taxable from 16.6.2005, while the applicant argued they were software development services. The Tribunal, after examining the contract terms, opined that the contracts were for the supply of manpower. The applicant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs.50,00,000 for admission of the appeal.

Issue 3: Taxability of services provided to SEZ units
Part of the services rendered by the applicant to units in SEZ was claimed to be exempt under Notification No.4/2004-ST. The exemption was not granted by the Commissioner due to lack of clear evidence that the services were consumed in SEZ. The applicant argued that certificates from TCS/Infosys confirming utilization of their services in SEZ should be accepted. The Tribunal found the evidence supporting the supply to SEZ insufficient and ordered the pre-deposit for appeal admission.

Issue 4: Limitation period for demand of service tax
The applicant contended that the demand was partly barred by limitation, particularly concerning a show-cause notice dated 10.10.2008. However, the Tribunal did not address this issue explicitly in the judgment.

Issue 5: Pre-deposit of dues for appeal consideration
The Tribunal ordered the applicant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.50,00,000 for admission of the appeal. Upon such deposit, the pre-deposit of the remaining dues from the adjudication order was waived, and the collection of the balance dues stayed during the appeal's pendency. Compliance was required to be reported by a specified date.

This comprehensive analysis summarizes the key points and decisions made in the legal judgment delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai.

---